Volume Estimation of Ultrasound Thyroid Gland Image

Authors

  • D. Shraddha Student, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vasavi College of Engineering, Ibrahimbagh, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Neetu Chikyal Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vasavi College of Engineering, Ibrahimbagh, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/(rrjobi).v8i1.1131

Keywords:

Thyroid segmentation, particle swarm optimization, a block difference of inverse probabilities thyroid volume

Abstract

Thyroid volume is very much important in the follow-up procedure after treatment of enlarged thyroid glands. Among the various types of available imaging techniques, an ultrasound imaging is one of the commonly used techniques, as it is a non-invasive technique, which does not require any ionizing radiation. The present study proposes a technique useful to calculate thyroid volume. After separating the thyroid gland region by the segmentation process, a particle swarm optimization technique is used for estimation of the volume of thyroid gland.

References

Pleśniak J, Urbański S. Comparative thyroid gland volume by two methods: Ultrasonography and planar scintigraphy. Polish J Radiol. 2012; 77(2): 19–21. doi: 10.12659/pjr.882966.

Mahmood NH, Rusli AH. Segmentation and Area Measurement for Thyroid Ultrasound Image. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2011; 2(12): 1–8.

Kollorz ENK, Hahn DA, Linke R, Goecke TW, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Quantification of thyroid volume using 3-D ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27(4): 457–466. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.907328.

Wunderling T, Golla B, Poudel P, Arens C, Friebe M, Hansen C. Comparison of thyroid segmentation techniques for 3D ultrasound. Med Imaging 2017: Image Process. 2017; 10133: 1013317. doi: 10.1117/12.2254234.

Garg H, Jindal A. Segmentation of thyroid gland in ultrasound image using neural network. 2013 4th Int Conf Comput Commun Netw Technol (ICCCNT). 2013; 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726797.

Chang CY, Lei YF, Tseng CH, Shih SR. Thyroid segmentation and volume estimation in ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57(6): 1348–1357. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2041003.

Patil S. Preprocessing to be Considered for MR and CT Images Containing Tumors. IOSR J Electr Electron Eng. 2012; 1(4): 54–57. doi: 10.9790/1676-0145457.

Thivakaran TK, Chandrasekaran R. Nonlinear Filter Based Image Denoising Using AMF Approach. 2010; 224–227. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1803.

Nguyen VD, Nguyen DT, Nguyen TD, Truong QD, Le MD. Combination of block difference inverse probability features and support vector machine to reduce false positives in computer-aided detection for massive lesions in mammographic images. Proc 2013 6th Int Conf Biomed Eng Informatics, BMEI 2013. 2013; 28–32. doi: 10.1109/BMEI.2013.6746901.

Koundal D. Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodule: A Review. Int J Comput Sci Eng Surv. 2012; 3(4): 67–83. doi: 10.5121/ijcses.2012.3406.

I. Conference, O. Innovations, and A. I. Science. Thyroid Segmentation and Volume Estimation Using CT Images. IJIRSET. 2014; 3(Special Issue 5): 334–339.

Shabana W, Peeters E, De Maeseneer M. Measuring thyroid gland volume: Should we change the correction factor? Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(1): 234–236. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.0816.

Chikyal N, Swamy KV. Performance assessment of various thyroid image segmentation techniques with consistency verification. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst. 2019; 11(2) Special Issue: 1299–1309.

Published

2021-06-17

Issue

Section

Research Article