Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Effect of Voltage on Aluminium Nanopore Images using Digital Image Processing Techniques

Parashuram Bannigidad, Jalaja Udoshi, C. C. Vidyasagar

Abstract


Research on nanotechnology, by and large is dedicated to ordered, controlled and customized fabrication of nanopores. The proposed study emphases on groping the morphology of alumina through FESEM images and characterization using automatic tool developed using image processing software.  The proposed automatic tool measures the effect of variable voltage (35, 40 and 45 V) on alumina at constant concentration (4.7%), time (8 min) and temperature (5oC). It has been observed that the increase in voltage has increased the pore size from 17.10nm to 40.68nm but the wall thickness initially increased from 34.94nm to 50.09nm with the increase in voltage from 35V to 40V but decreased to 45.36nm at 45 V. Similarly the porosity also increased from 0.43% to 0.80% with the increase in voltage from 35V to 40V but decreased to 0.76% at 45V. The analysis depict that the samples obtained at 40V is having porosity and wall thickness relatively more than the samples obtained  at 45V.  From this we could conclude that, the oxidation potential in formation of aluminum (Al) to Alumina (Al2O3) at 40V make the porosity and wall thickness reach the maximum of 0.808% and 50.09nm respectively. Later as the voltage increases the thick aluminum starts dissolving relatively more into the acidic bath solution which leads to increase in pore size and decline in wall thickness and porosity. The experimental results are analyzed and compared with manual results obtained from the chemist and the efficacy of the experimental result is witnessed in this study.

Keywords: Alumina, aluminium nanopore image analysis, FESEM, nanomaterial, nanopore characterization, porosity 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Gerrard EJP, Nurshahidah A, Derek F. Progress in nano-Engineered Anodic Aluminum Oxide Membrane Development. Materials. 2011; 4: 487- 526p.

Seeram R, Murugan R, Kumar TSS, Soboyejo WO. Biomaterials A Nano Approach 1st Edition. Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742, USA: CRC Press. 2010.

Wojciech S, Agata N, Adam P, Tomasz C, Robert V. The effects of time and temperature on the arrangement of anodic aluminum oxide nanopores. Materials Characterization. 2014; 91: 1-9p.

Michalska-Domańska M, Norek M, Stępniowski WJ, Budner B. Fabrication of high quality anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) on low purity aluminum—a comparative study with the AAO produced on high purity aluminum. Electrochimica Acta. 2013; 105: 424- 432p.

Belwalkar A, Grasing E, Geertruyden WV, Huang Z, Misiolek WZ. Effect of processing parameters on pore structure and thickness of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) tubular membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2008; 319: 192–198p.

Chen W, Yuan J, Xia X. Characterization and manipulation of the electroosmotic flow in porous anodic alumina membranes. Anal. Chem. 2005; 77: 8102– 8108p.

Araoyinbo AO, Noor AFM, Sreekantan S, Aziz A. Voltage Effect on Electrochemical Anodization of Aluminum at Ambient Temperature. IJMME. 2010; 5: 53-58p.

Fois G, Bolger CT, Holmes JD, Cross GLW. Novel pre-oxidation pattering on thin aluminum film generating ordered nanopores through anodization. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2010; 1258: 1258- Q05-01.

Araoyinbo AO, Rahmat A, Derman MN, Ahmad KR. Room temperature anodization of aluminum and the effect of the electrochemical cell in the formation of porous alumina films from acid and alkaline electrolytes. Adv. Mat. Lett. 2012; 3 (4): 273-278p.

Lee W, Kim JC. Spontaneous Current Oscillations during Hard Anodization of Aluminum under Potentiostatic Conditions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010; 20: 21–27p.

Bannigidad P, Vidyasagar CC. Effect of Time on Anodized Al2O3 Nanopore FESEM Images using Digital Image Processing Techniques: A Study on Computational Chemistry. IJETTCS. 2015; 4: 15-22p.

Vidyasagar CC, Bannigidad P, Muralidhara HB. Influence of anodizing time on porosity of nanopore structures grown on flexible TLC aluminium films and analysis of images using MATLAB software. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016; 7 (1): 71-77p.

Bannigidad P, Udoshi J, Vidyasagar CC. Effect of Concentration and Temperature on Aluminium Oxide Nanopore FESEM Images. IJCEA. 2018; 12: 222-229p.

Zhou L, Tan Y, Wang J, Xu W, Yuan Y, Cai W, Zhu S, Zhu J. 3D self-assembly of aluminium nanoparticles for plasmon-enhanced solar desalination. Nature Photonics. 2016; 10: 393–398p.

Surwade SP, Smirnov SN, Vlassiouk IV, Unocic RR, Veith GM, Dai S, Mahurin SM. Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer grapheme. Nature Nanotech. 2015; 10: 459–464p.

Dai J, Singh J, Yamamoto N. Nonbrittle nanopore deformation of anodic aluminum oxide membranes. J Am Ceram Soc. 2018; 101: 170–2180p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.