Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Synergistic Approach to Exhaust Gas Treatment: A ‘One Stack’ Solution

Akankshaya Priyadarshini Ratha, Erin Anto, Ritika Haridas Nair

Abstract


Taking cue from global changes, humankind is always in a race against time to come up with pertinent technologies that would cater to their ever-evolving requirements. As we magnify into the highprecision kinetic models of the current exhaust gas systems deployed onboard ships, we evaluate the substantial presence of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, particulate matter, and other harmful pollutants. Releasing these gases to the atmosphere, untreated, can have a plethora of implications that can be categorized under technical, economical, and environmental heads. Through this paper, we propose an integrated versatile exhaust gas treatment system that is designed to target specific pollutants in a sequential process. In the initial segment of the paper, we try to elaborate on the methodologies proposed for the step-by-step treatment of CO2, Sox, and NOx present in the flue gas. Thereafter, in the latter segment of the paper, we run an economic analysis to check the feasibility of installing the integration of these subsystems onboard a vessel.

Full Text:

PDF

References


SVoskian S, Hatto TA. Faradaic electro-swing reactive adsorption for CO2 capture. Energy Environ

Sci. 2019; 12: 3530-3547. doi: 10.1039/C9EE02412C.

Wang Z, Feng J, Liu X, Guo H. Preparation methods and performance analysis of polyanthraquinone/carbon nanotube composites for capturing carbon dioxide. Atmosphere. 2022; 13 (4): 543.

doi: 10.3390/atmos13040543.

Al Baroudi H, Awoyomi A, Patchigolla K, Jonnalagadda K, Anthony EJ. A review of large-scale

CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilization and storage. Appl

Energy. 2021; 287: 116510.

Stefano Pineda BS. Feasibility assessment for amine-based shipboard carbon capture link. [Online].

Available at https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/139271/Pineda_stpineda_sm-meche2021-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#:~:text=The%20ship%20system%20components%20

are,%24200%20per%20ton%20of%20CO2.

Herzog HJ, Drake EM. Carbon dioxide recovery and disposal from large energy systems. Annu

Rev Energy Environ. 1996; 21: 145:166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.145.

Johnston P, Santillo D, Stringer R, Parmentier R, Hare B, Krueger M. Ocean disposal/sequestration

of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel production and use: an overview of rationale, techniques and

implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1999; 6 (4): 245–246. doi: 10.1007/BF02987340.

Whiteman C. Selective non-catalytic reduction technology costs for industrial sources. Memo from

Chad Whiteman, Deputy Director, Institute of Clean Air Companies. March 18, 2009. [Online].

Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-12/documents/sncrcostmanualchapter7

thedition2016 2017revisions.pdf

Institute of Clean Air Companies (ICAC). Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) for

controlling NOx Emissions. White Paper. Prepared by the SNCR Committee of ICAC. February

[Online]. Available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/icac.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/Standards_

WhitePapers/SNCR_Whitepaper_Final.pdf

Koebel M, Strutz EO. Thermal and hydrolytic decomposition of urea for automotive selective

catalytic reduction systems: thermochemical and practical aspects Indus Eng Chem Res. 2003; 42

(10): 2093–2100.

Keener TC, Davis WT. Study of the reaction of SO2 with NaHCO3 and Na2CO3. J Air Pollut Control

Assoc. 1984; 34 (6): 651–654. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1984.10465793.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joost.v10i2.1478

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.