Advantages of Having DP Class 3 for Well Stimulation Vessels (WSVS) Compared to Existing DP Class 2 Possibility and Analysis of Failures of DP2 Capable WSVS
Abstract
An intervention performed on an oil or gas well to increase production by improving the flow of hydrocarbons from the reservoir into the well bore is well stimulation. The improvements in completion treatmenttechniques like Well stimulation have impacted recovery rates of hydrocarbons such that there is a possibility to pull tens of millions of barrels of oil out of a well, all whilekeeping that well online for 20 years.To perform such kind of precise works and to apply fracturing techniques vessel should remain in fixed position until the operation is completed. Hence, Dynamic position systems plays an important role while performing well stimulation activity. This review paper aims at discussing the advantages of having DP class 3 for well stimulation vessels when compared to existing DP class 2 possibility and analysis of failure of DP class 2 capability WSVS.
Keywords:Hull Model, General arrangement plan, Ship General particulars, Loading conditions, Stability Calculations, Thrusters, Switch boards,Dynamic positioning (DP) Vessel, DP Class 1, DP Class 2, DP Capability theory, DP Capability Plots.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |