Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Review on Junk DNA

Yash Sindhu, Alishba Aqlim, Surya Prakash D V

Abstract


For many years, although being incredibly catchy, the term junk DNA discouraged mainstream scientists from exploring noncoding genetic material. Among humans, the DNA that actually codes for protein synthesis is 2% only. Hence, the noncoding region of genome is then termed Junk DNA. The junk DNA component is drastically different. Hence at the time of investigating the role of satellite DNA for the fertility and survival in pure species, the scientists had this idea that these repetitive sequences of genome might play a key role in the process of speciation. The STR sequence around the motif has been shown to have a significant impact on transcription factor binding, offering hints as to what these repeating sequences may be accomplishing. The researchers reduced the mechanisms to their most fundamental components—naked DNA and transcription factors—in order to better understand the function of short tandem repeats in gene expression. Researchers may be able to get insight into the function of such sequences in polygenic illnesses by studying the effects of noncoding regulatory regions on transcription factor binding. 


Keywords


Junk DNA, Genetics, Genome, Human, Disease

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kirchberger PC, Schmidt ML, Ochman H. The ingenuity of bacterial genomes. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2020 Sep 8;74:815-34.

Misteli T. The self-organizing genome: principles of genome architecture and function. Cell. 2020 Oct 1;183(1):28-45.

Cusanelli E, Chartrand P. Telomeric noncoding RNA: telomeric repeat‐containing RNA in telomere biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA. 2014 May;5(3):407-19.

Gregory TR, Hebert PD. The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Research. 1999 Apr 1;9(4):317-24.

Grantham R (1974) Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution. Science. 185:862–864.

Gulko B, Hubisz MJ, Gronau I, Siepel A (2015). A method for calculating probabilities of fitness consequences for point mutations across the human genome. Nat Genet. 47:276–283.

Jablonski D (2008) Species selection: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Sys.t 39:501–524.

Kozak M (1991) A short leader sequence impairs the fidelity of initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Gene Expr 1:111–115.

Ecker JR, Bickmore WA, Barroso I, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y, et al. (2012) Genomics: ENCODE explained. Nature 489: 52–55.

Pennisi E (2012) Genomics. ENCODE project writes eulogy for junk DNA. Science 337: 1159-67.

Orgel LE, Crick FH (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284: 604–607.

Doolittle WF, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284: 601–603.

Kidwell MG, Lisch DR (2001) Perspective: transposable elements, parasitic DNA, and genome evolution. Evol Int J Org Evol 55: 1–24.

Gazave E, Marqués-Bonet T, Fernando O, Charlesworth B, Navarro A (2007) Patterns and rates of intron divergence between humans and chimpanzees. Genome Biol 8: 21-28.

Keightley PD (2012) Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics 190: 295–304.

Scally A, Durbin R (2012) Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution. Nat Rev Genet 13: 745–753.

Hickey DA, Benkel BF, Abukashawa SM (1989) A general model for the evolution of nuclear pre-mRNA introns. J Theor Biol 137: 41–53.

Ferat JL, Michel F (1993) Group II self-splicing introns in bacteria. Nature 364: 358–361.

Wyers F, Rougemaille M, Badis G, Rousselle J-C, Dufour M-E, et al. (2005) Cryptic pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 121: 725–737.

Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Terzi N, Soares LM, Buratowski S (2008) Transcription termination and RNA degradation contribute to silencing of RNA polymerase II transcription within heterochromatin. Mol Cell 29: 313–323.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/(rrjobt).v13i2.1455

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Research & Reviews: A Journal of Biotechnology