Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Advanced survey techniques for mapping-A case study of ratnagiri hill Udaipur

Shripad Shewalkar, Kaival Prajapati, Veer Deputy, Komal Parikh

Abstract


The research strives to enhance digital surveying methodologies for precise and detailed land mapping, utilizing advanced instruments like terrestrial scanners, SLAM scanners, total stations, DGPS, and drones. The survey conducted at Ratnagiri Hill in Udaipur aims to scrutinize and compare the merits and drawbacks of each surveying method. The study outlines a systematic process encompassing data collection, processing, output generation, and validation of survey techniques. It highlights the adaptability of these methods across various
domains, such as building conservation, restoration, and mapping of typically inaccessible areas, emphasizing their potential for time and resource savings. The research underscores the effectiveness of a one-time data collection process for subsequent work, laying the groundwork for the advancement of digital surveying technologies. When integrated with the Total station and DGPS survey, the combination of terrestrial scanners, drones, and SLAM scanners achieves a vertical accuracy of around 32 mm.


Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955.

J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.

S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.

Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August 1987 [Digests

th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].

M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.

Potekar Umesh P., Naik Deepa D., and Patil Abhijit S. Geospatial approach for Landslide Susceptibility

Mapping techniques: A Case Study of Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra, India. Disaster Advances; Vol. 16(4); 34-45; doi: https://doi.org/10.25303/1604da034045; (2023).

Harvey AS, Fotopoulos G. Geological mapping using machine learning algorithms. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2016 Jun 23;

:423-30.

Casagli N, Frodella W, Morelli S, Tofani V, Ciampalini A, Intrieri E, Raspini F, Rossi G, Tanteri L, Lu P.

Spaceborne, UAV and ground-based remote sensing techniques for landslide mapping, monitoring, and early warning. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 2017 Dec; 4:1-23.

Finkl CW, Makowski C, Vollmer H. Advanced techniques for mapping biophysical environments on

carbonate banks using Laser Airborne Depth Sounding (LADS) and IKONOS satellite imagery. In Remote Sensing and Modeling: Advances in Coastal and Marine Resources 2014 Jun 17 (pp. 31-63). Cham:

Springer International Publishing.

Casagli N, Morelli S, Frodella W, Intrieri E, Tofani V. TXT-tool 2.039-3.2 ground-based remote sensing techniques for landslides mapping, monitoring, and early warning. Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools: Volume 1: Fundamentals, Mapping and Monitoring. 2018:255-74.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/.v14i3.1546

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 2230-7990