Comparative Analysis of Vapour Compression Mini Ice Cream Plant by Using Different Size Capillary Tubes
Abstract
Abstract
An experimental set up is made for comparative analysis of vapour compression mini ice cream plant by applying different size capillary tubes. The experiments were performed and results were recorded for comparing the best unit. The capillary tube was formed in coil shape having different inner diameters such as 0.79 and 1.12 mm. The pressure at suction and discharge of capillary were recorded to evaluate the cycle COP, power consumed, mass flow of refrigerant and compression pressure ratio. The increase of coiled inner diameter significantly affects the working parameter. The COP of experiment no. 2 was found to be more than the experiment no. 1. The mass flow of refrigerant for experiment no. 2 was found to be optimum than experiment no. 1 and compression pressure ratio for experiment no. 1 was found to be optimum as compared with experiment no. 2.
Keywords: Evaporator, compressor, condenser, capillary tube, fan, pump and brine solution
Cite this Article
Rajkumar Singh Chauhan, Neelesh Soni, Siddhartha Kosti. Comparative Analysis of Vapour Compression Mini Ice Cream Plant by Using Different Size Capillary Tubes. Journal of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, Heating and Ventilation. 2016; 3(3): 30–34p.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |