Experimental Evaluation of Environmental Friendly and Low Global Warming Refrigerants as an Alternative Option for Window Air Conditioning System
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental evaluation and performance comparison of window air-conditioning system with R-410A and R32 and to compare with HCFC-22 refrigerant. The base line test is performed with 2 “Ton of Refrigeration” (TR) capacities air conditioner, with evaporator temperature of 7.2 °C and condenser temperature of 54.4 °C. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the refrigerants R32, R22 and R410A are 3.81, 3.15 and 2.17 respectively simulated; it is observed that for the same condenser and evaporator temperatures the R32 COP is 36% higher with R410A. The operating pressure is an important parameter in air-conditioning system, at evaporator temperature of −10˚C and condenser temperature of 35 °C the pressure ratios for R22, R410A and R32 are 3.81, 3.72 and 3.75. The environmental issues are much more important, R22 is having ozone layer depletion potential 0.05 and global warming effect 1700, R410 global warming potential 2100. R32 has specific advantages as it has zero ozone depletion potential and low global warming potential.
Keywords: HCFCs, R32, R410, Refrigeration, Ton of Refrigeration, COP
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |